Find content gaps holding back your SEO. Analyze competitor coverage and identify high-value topics to create next.
Compare your domain against competitors and list the keywords they rank for that you do not.
| Keyword | Volume | Difficulty | Competitor Rankings | Opportunity |
|---|
Give it your domain and two or three competitors. It pulls the keyword sets each domain ranks for, subtracts yours, and returns what is left with positions and demand attached.
The useful part is not the list. It is the grouping. Two hundred missing keywords is an unusable output; six themes containing two hundred keywords is a content plan.
THEME KEYWORDS THEY RANK YOU
client reporting 34 2 of 3 no
white label workflows 21 3 of 3 no
per seat pricing 18 1 of 3 partial
onboarding a new client 15 2 of 3 no
time tracking integration 12 1 of 3 no
STRONGEST SINGLE GAP
"white label seo reports"
all 3 competitors rank top 10, you do not rank
The "they rank" column decides priority. A theme all three competitors cover is a subject your market expects to find and you do not have. A theme one competitor covers may just be that competitor's hobby.
Partial coverage is the cheapest win on the list. Ranking somewhere for a theme means a page already exists and needs strengthening rather than commissioning.
This compares who ranks in Google. Whether AI engines cite competitors instead of you is a separate measurement with separate causes, and the AI equivalent of this tool answers it. Gaps in one do not reliably predict gaps in the other.
How many competitors should I compare?
Three is the sweet spot. One is anecdote, five produces a list nobody acts on.
Should I target every gap?
No. Some belong to a business you are not in.
What does it cost?
It runs on credits, not a subscription, and credits never expire.
Run it against two or three competitors you already lose to. The overlap is usually smaller, and more actionable, than people expect.
Runs on credits · No subscription · Credits never expire